| re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags | |
|
Posted by: |
Pudding 09:20 am UTC 04/29/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - rockfenris2005 08:01 am UTC 04/29/07 |
> > > Yes cos writing a musical about singing and dancing cats > > was a dead cert for success ;o) > > > > Pud > > Well, it took 200 investors to mount "Cats". But that's > not the point. Despite his huge successes with "Jesus > Christ Superstar", "Evita", "Cats" and "The Phantom Of The > Opera", he hasn't had a major hit in 20 years. If "The > Phantom Of Manhattan" goes down it could end his career. > If it succeeds, it could be like BAT II Cats was probably his riskiest venture yet, and it paid off big time, and YES it is the point. Where you get 200 investors from? sounds like utter bullshit to me as Cameron Mackintosh and RUG produced the show. I think what ALW has achieved is more than enough success for anyone. If people are going to constantly gauge what he's done since Phantom then yeah, his resume is gonna look pretty shit on statistics alone. POTO2 win or lose ALW is still a very very rich man. Pud | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - pidunk 11:02 am UTC 04/29/07 |
| Next: | re: Andrew Lloyd Moneybags - rockfenris2005 09:47 am UTC 04/29/07 |
| Thread: |
|