> Not wanting to stir things again. Bit I read all I can in
> that song. Mayber it differs from your perception of the
> song. But its my opinion. So please to not just mereley
> discredit it.
I am not discrediting your perception of the song. However, you can't tell John Denver that he didn't write Annie's Song for Annie. Yet married couples worldwide dedicate that song to each other in bliss and joy within their own unique loves. Have your meaning, and let me have mine.
>But you are right. I do find I can relate
> that song to a past situation. Despite not believing you.
I give you only logical constructs. You say, gee your logic was right, but I don't believe you. One does not have anything to do with another. There is only one purpose served by repeating constantly that I am not to be believed, and that has an agenda, and all agendas are political.
> BEcause I go with established fact.
You do not know established fact. You are nowhere where you can know any established fact. It does not matter how much you read if you misinterpret what you read, and it does not matter how much of falsehoods you read if you think false is fact. If you go with established fact, sometime you wanted to know fact, or some connection between you and the established fiction exists. I have no time for you.
|
