| re: The Question of 'Imposter /Multiple Personality' Postings | |
|
Posted by: |
sturse 11:16 pm UTC 09/14/07 |
| In reply to: | The Question of 'Imposter /Multiple Personality' Postings - Leesa 11:08 pm UTC 09/14/07 |
| It's not as if set out to create mulitple aliases. It happened mostly b/c the people here get all clique-y and gang-y on you and you just don't want all the crap dragged up from last time - so you create a new one to post your thoughts without having all that prejudice along with it. So that's why. > Forgive me for being really naive here, but what is the > big rush, the 'dynamic of the website' if you will, > derived from posting as aliases? You know, it pissed me > off to no end to be accused by Susan of being all these > nutjobs from her past. The irony of that is is the fact > that SHE is the imposter, posting as different people. > Which, thinking about it, is typical of the guilty to > accuse others of what they have done. I dislike that woman > more and more...whether she could help it or not. > Why having a singular identity on a forum like this is a > big creative roadblock, I can't see. I guess if say Smeg > wanted to debate himself to draw out a point, maybe. As > long as it was a really pertinent JIM point. But honestly, > if you want to post under an alias, fine. I don't always > want my name all over the net, especially if I say > something with perceived repercussions. But I've always > been proud to support Jim, say what I believe and take > pride in not hiding behind an alias to do so. I could > NEVER imagine pretending to be someone else here--and as a > 47 yr old fan, that might say something about my lack of > internet experience, but anything I have to say I'll say > it as myself and take my lumps. > I have no problem with Sturse's poster name taken in lieu > of telling the world who he really is, but if he wants to > cop 14 personalities here, I guess to me that's confusing > and kinda pointless. > I don't mean to pass judgement on people, it's just that I > can't understand the attraction of fooling people here. > A couple years back there was a strong stand taken against > 'imposter posts' to the point Ryan was banned for > pretending ( and not convincingly so) to be Desmond Child, > in a pretty obvious attempt at humour, not malice. > Like I said, I'm not judging, I just don't understand why > the revelation of IPs are a big deal. > Leesa > > > February 2006 - > > I wish there were a log. > > I bootleged the Blizzrd concert of TDE. I sat close to the > > stage and got some interfernce. I believe Pudding or Maybe > > even Dave hosted them for dowload. Someone sent me a > > karaoke disc of TDV (which is completely an totally > > awesome - forgive me for forgetting whom sent it, but > > being away from the board dulls the memory) > > > > The address I and names I used then were lost or banned > > andbut I must have registered this name and email account > > and so now I use it. > > > > I use aliases, b/c that's what I do. Lots of peole do - > > hell - ain't Meat Loaf an alias. > > > > I come ack to the oard and all hell breaks loose. I am > > attacked for not conforming to the same opions as the > > majority, am accused of being the very peopleyou drove > > away, and JD in her Bush administrating style opens up the > > ISP logs to out who I am, much the way Valerie Plame was > > treated. > > > > I don't ant people knowing who I am for these and other > > reasons. I am Stephen Purse, I am Jack Slattery, I am a > > hundred other voices circling round in my head. I am not > > Jakoutof Hell, I am not Susan, and I'm not a nutter. I > > have been around sine the mid 90's when the internet as > > new and mails were traded back and forth. (I had other > > names then too). The chip on myshoulder is there for good > > reason. I have shared and recieved, I have come eeking > > knowledge, and am frustrated that I have to sift through > > garbag - I'll never find my gold on a sandy beach. This, > > by the way, is true of other lists, of other types across > > the internet. > > > > If I am banned, I will come back - I come back in spite of > > all the rap b/c JD has made sure this is the official and > > primary place of business to discuss Jim, and sometimes > > the truth trickles through. > > > > But - in the interest of quelling the tempest I have so > > regrettably kicked up (I dont regret what I've said or > > done, merely that the Monster is Loose) - I will start > > here, and hope we can all move forward. > > > > And again in asking, if you know my given name, please do > > not reveal it - nor trust that you think you know it. > > I was given a name at birth, and I have taken, and have > > had taken from me, and taken again yet another > > professional name. But I move forward here on this board > > as Stephen Purse - aka sturse. I live in and work in NYC > > and I am a fanof Jim's. I will not partake in further > > nonsense, but will coexist. I am open to questions, as > > long as you are open to the truth. The names maybe > > changed to protect the innocent, but I will not (nor have > > I yet) lie. > > > > I'm tired now - and this is why, again, I lurk among the > > shadows for so long. I wish not to be so tired aymore. > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | The Question of 'Imposter /Multiple Personality' Postings - Leesa 11:08 pm UTC 09/14/07 |
| Next: | re: The Question of 'Imposter /Multiple Personality' Postings - daveake 07:06 am UTC 09/15/07 |
| Thread: |
|