HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Confusion about the new interview

Posted by:
BMV 06:24 am UTC 10/01/07
In reply to: re: Confusion about the new interview - Venom 05:31 am UTC 10/01/07


> To be fair, didn't Jim also sue Meat after lost his voice
> and couldn't record the follow up to Bat 1?


Yeah, but Jim didn't dedicate Bad for Good to Meat.

It's just always upset me that Meat would threaten to take Jim to court over whether or not he could call the album Bat III, then have the audacity to dedicate the album to him! It makes no logical sense.

--BMV



reply |
Previous: re: Confusion about the new interview - Venom 05:31 am UTC 10/01/07
Next: re: Confusion about the new interview - Pudding 06:43 am UTC 10/01/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE