not logged in
| re: I wanna hear the rest of that story :( | |
Posted by:  |
rockfenris2005 06:22 am UTC 02/04/08 |
| In reply to: | re: I wanna hear the rest of that story :( - Leesa 01:47 pm UTC 02/03/08 |
I think you said, in one of the posts, that Jim fought a lot in the studio? I'm intrigued by that statement. What else do you know about that? Because what I always found interesting was that the article you provided, on Billy, contradicted a lot of what Jim said about the project in 1989. I was kind'a shocked, although I guess a lot could change in 5 years. Jim's practically praising the album in the article you provided, then he turns around and says all this other stuff in 1989. Also, a little O/T, but what I always found partially sad was...Jim producing all these acts, occasionally passing them a few songs, for 8 years when, when "Bad For Good" and "Dead Ringer" came out, he was really passionate about stage & screen. He wanted to produce "Neverland". He still wanted to produce "Neverland" in 1994, and it took all that time. Was Jim just procrastinating or did Hollywood think he was crazy? In 1984, he should have made the move from "Footloose" and "Streets Of Fire" into producing a full-blown "movical" epic like "Neverland". It's a shame that he didn't, and it's amazing how people can get side-tracked. I guess the upside is that "Neverland" will be bigger, better and more explosive and spectacular than ever. Hopefully the film gets made in Jim's lifetime. > Jim told the cover story because that's what Billy was > peddling as party line. Jim's as brilliant a salesman as > he is composer. Jim wasn't far from 'TEOTH' success, so > it's not like he was completely yesterday's news. I > thought most of the breakdowns with Jim's recording came > during 'Bad For Good' whilst Jim was doing it all. But > just thinking about working with His Loafness would be > enough to make me break out in shingles... > 'Signs' is an album with 2 amazing artists with distinct > strengths that were either going to work well together and > compliment each other (like Meat and Jim on the first > 'Bat'), or play up inherent weaknesses of each and just > blow loogies. Believe me the 'Rock Me Tonight' video > wasn't what sunk the boat here. The material was overall > the weakest Billy had ever written/recorded, in my > opinion. If you can get it cheap, get it as it's an > interesting historical footnote. But it really doesn't do > two magnificent artists justice. > I always felt that Jim lacks as a producer, particularly > in being devoid of virtually all rock instincts. He IS one > of the most powerful writers the genre has ever seen, > however--just look at Rocky Hor---nevermind, just > KIDDING!!! That's why Rundgrend/Iovine have been > instrumental for his production/mixing bests. > Cheers! > Leesa J > > > > > I can see why Jim told the cover-up story (which I didn't > > really believe anyway. Yes, recording is a very stressful > > process, but if Jim was right about Mutt, how come > > everyone involved in "Bat 2" didn't have SEVERAL nervous > > breakdowns? Ask Dave Thoener about the recording! He can > > tell you stories that will put you in shock!) Anyway... > > The Billy Squier album is the only Steinman/CD that I > > don't have in my collection. I've always avoided it for > > some reason. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: I wanna hear the rest of that story :( - Leesa 01:47 pm UTC 02/03/08 |
| Next: | re: I wanna hear the rest of that story :( - Leesa 09:59 pm UTC 02/04/08 |
| Thread: |
|