HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again)

Posted by:
Pudding 09:37 pm UTC 08/17/08
In reply to: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Scaramouche 04:56 pm UTC 08/17/08

> The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal
> returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the
> piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for
> money.

Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money?

How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf?


reply |

Previous: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Scaramouche 04:56 pm UTC 08/17/08
Next: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Rob 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE