re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Pudding 09:37 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
In reply to: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Scaramouche 04:56 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
> The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal > returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the > piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for > money. Value for money...hmmm...now there's an interesting thought. Who can say what is or isn't value for money? How much would you be willing to pay to see Meat Loaf? | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Scaramouche 04:56 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Next: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Rob 10:39 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Thread: |
|