not logged in
| A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers | |
Posted by:  |
Smeghead 04:35 pm UTC 08/29/08 |
| In reply to: | re: smeg aka Jim's bitch please read - Smeghead 11:23 am UTC 08/29/08 |
| The average Loaf fan appears to believe that the only way this musical will be a success is if Loaf is involved with it. How many of them actually know what it is about? What Neverland is? Most of them want Loaf involved because the are rabid fans of his and thus claim it will fail without his involvement. Tanz was a success without Loaf or Bonnie Tyler's involvement even though it contained songs of theirs. Sell the show on its own merrits... not on the fact that Loaf's name is associated with the title. Seriously the best thing they could do is subtitle the show Neverland or Adventures in Neverland. Let people know it is not a Loaf musical upfront. Fans of the music will still go to see it. Personally I'd still prefer to call it Neverland... it is a much better title for the show. Unfortunately Jim is afraid the show won't sail on its own merrits. > You obviously don't know what the musical is about. What > point is there in making the public think the musical has > anything to do with Meat and make him the face of it when > it is about a Teenage Peter Pan. You will simply get a > bunch of people who feel lied to and who will feel ripped > off because it wasn't about a fat man who lost his ability > to enunciate and sing on key. Then the show will get bad > word of mouth and will flop. To make Meat the face of the > musical will spell its doom. > > > > > > > Are you on Glue, no matter how high it is written “ Jim > > Steinman’s Bat out of hell the musical “ it will be known > > to the masses as meat loaf bat out of hell the musical, > > > > If Meat has no input is not the face of the show is not at > > the promos and the opening night (with Jim) with his arms > > around the pretty girls with his scarf, the show will > > flop, the second Meat utters the dreaded word “I have > > nothing to do with this show, it’s a dead duck, and to > > cap it of what real hope have we that this will be > > happening, each week makes me feel like its another Dream > > Engine. Never going to happen….. > > > > > > > > > > Is that serious question? Meat can help promote this > > > > musical better then anyone for the fact hes more known for > > > > it. > > > > > > What that has to do with him being good at promoting the > > > musical I don't see. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > it is a 50/50 > > > > ownership there (not in paper but the idea), > > > > > > How do you figure that? Where does any actor gain half > > > ownership over a title they are cast in. Crawford is best > > > know as The Phantom, but he doesn't own half the musical > > > and wasn't used to promote the film. > > > > > > > > > > Ps. Where has Meat claimed he wrote BOOH, I know he has > > > > stated that he gave ideas and shared his opinions..... > > > > > > In the papers he filed in court to gain ownership of Jim's > > > Trademark. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: smeg aka Jim's bitch please read - Smeghead 11:23 am UTC 08/29/08 |
| Next: | re: A serious question to all the blindly Loyal Loafers - Rob 06:22 pm UTC 08/29/08 |
| Thread: |
|