| re: Celine Dion |
|
Posted by:
 |
daveake 08:25 pm UTC 04/10/09 |
| In reply to: |
re: Celine Dion - steven_stuart 08:06 pm UTC 04/10/09 |
|
> No. It wasn't just a case of people preferring Elaine's
> version.
> As Bellminer pointed out in this thread, someone
> threw their Celine Dion CD away.
And I'd refuse a copy of Meat's version (which is worse) because it's nowhere near as good as Elaine's version. What's the point in having an inferior version? I can say this without being negative towards Celine - she's a very good singer. She just doesn't do emotion.
> You say: "Celine's version is completely unsurprising."
No, I didn't. You need to read the entire sentence and not just the part you selectively quoted. I said that it was unsurprising that people preferred Elaine's version, because it is so much better.
Dave
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Celine Dion - steven_stuart 08:06 pm UTC 04/10/09 |
| Next: |
re: Celine Dion - steven_stuart 09:12 pm UTC 04/10/09 |
|
| Thread: |
|