| re: Separating the Meat from the chaff | |
|
Posted by: |
Infinite_Victims 12:44 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| In reply to: | Separating the Meat from the chaff - Vin 12:36 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| I found that strange also. Four out of twenty-four ain't good. The info I read before was how excited everyone was about the material and seemed like it would be tough to cut any out. I don't think it bodes well that they are still apparently trying to come up with more material while in studio recording. It is hard to believe they got this far in the process and now seem to have ended up needing more material at this late date. I don't see Jim offering anything all of a sudden, I doubt they'd ask him which is probably why this band is there now. Hopefully they have 8 good songs done and can come up with a couple more acceptable tunes. > So Meat has posted on Twitter that they started recording > with 23 (or 24?) songs for the new album, and all but 4 > have since been discarded. Seems weird; I thought he was > very excited about the material they had going into this > thing. Anyway, they apparently have 8 tracks down and > Meat and some guys from Shinedown are brainstorming for > more songs. I'm not sure how well that bodes. > > Is it time for Jim to offer Meat a song or two? > > Would Meat even want a Jim song if it were offered? > > I do trust Rob Cavallo's producing abilities. I would > trust him with "Body." (I was optimistic about Desmond, > its true, but with him I was pretty much only going off of > a couple Alice Cooper records; Cavallo's got a much more > impressive track record, I think, especially with > "American Idiot" and "Black Parade" under his belt.) | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Separating the Meat from the chaff - Smeghead 03:56 am UTC 07/11/09 |
| Next: | re: Separating the Meat from the chaff - BULLWHIP 02:58 pm UTC 07/10/09 |
| Thread: |
|