not logged in
| I've always been hella sceptical about that claim. | |
Posted by:  |
Wilbury 01:40 am UTC 05/16/11 |
| In reply to: | re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 07:15 pm UTC 05/15/11 |
| That's easy for Jim to say from the comfort of his desk chair with absolutely no onus to follow through. THAT SAID, the wealth of stuff we've had kicking around in the time since, what part of my body, speaking in tongues, cry to heaven, land of the pig, re-tooled versions of braver than we are, still the children… it's entirely possible I guess! The most suspicious part of that whole affair is that Jim claims one of his titles (in fact I think he claimed SONGS, implying its a little more finished) that he had ALREADY shown to meat was The Monster is Out Of The Cage. Having Desmond and John 5 come along and do Monster is Loose must really have been salt in the wound for Jim. If Meat ever wants to talk to Jim again, he really went the wrong way about it. > Dont be so sure, according to Jim's blog, Bat 3 would have > had entirely new songs had he been in control. > > > > Bat 2 should > > > have been entirely new songs, or at least most of them > > > should have been > > > > The speed Jim works at, we'd probably still be waiting. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 07:15 pm UTC 05/15/11 |
| Next: | re: I've always been hella sceptical about that claim. - rockfenris2005 02:29 am UTC 05/16/11 |
| Thread: |
|