HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Rory With Bonnie

Posted by:
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 09:02 pm UTC 06/11/07
In reply to: re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 02:11 am UTC 06/11/07

Not wanting to stir things again. Bit I read all I can in that song. Mayber it differs from your perception of the song. But its my opinion. So please to not just mereley discredit it. But you are right. I do find I can relate that song to a past situation. Despite not believing you. BEcause I go with established fact. you seem like a wise lady Susan. Would like to chat with you on msn someday

>
>
> >
> >
> > >
> > >
>
> You are responding to me on some level, and to the extent
> it is worth it you do bring about a part of discussion.
> But sitting on the fence between lack of thought and blind
> acceptance, as you call that which you do not comprehend,
> bullshit, is another thing. God gave us language for
> ourselves to use it, not to squander it. God gave us
> thought and senses for ourselves to exercise them.
> Combining the two may lead to some divine discussion, even
> if, at the end you still conclude your first impressions
> hold true for you. But we can't know differences if we
> live in one dimension. Maybe it is media, the fast-paced
> high tech environment of so much information that we
> accept we know it all, or all we need. But, as ignorant as
> any generation in the important things, we remain. Maybe
> Jim's life with mine, brought about a challenge to
> ourselves, and also to you. Maybe it is a challenge that
> you might benefit from. Jim's past telling lies in his
> life but you must understand that people tell lies not to
> be denigrated in some reputational hell, but to survive in
> an unsavory set of circumstances. As Jim the elder and the
> younger agree, lying is overrated as a vice. We should not
> fear the lies as much as our inabilities to see the truth.
> That is all that I am trying to say.
>
> Now, as for Surf's Up. The first time I heard it, I really
> loved the song until he got to the part of drowning in the
> bottomless sea. Then I put a frown on for the whole rest
> of the song. I still feel high anxiety with that line, but
> I try to put it aside for the other parts of it. It is a
> beautiful song, with erotic overtones, about more than
> what you read into it, and definitely not an unrequieted
> situation. Where it is seen in your mind as something
> one-sided, may be your projecting your own experiences
> onto it, for what the song meant to you. But, the song is
> about two who are deeply in love, with one who is
> approaching a level of growth that has uncertainties, not
> really knowing if he will get what he wants, and working
> so hard to attain it. I remember a time when Jim and I had
> such a circumstance. In some ways we still do. I remember
> moments that I hear in this song, and I also hear moments
> that have not yet come. As panoramic as a love song can
> be, this one is. It is full-dimensional, full emotion, and
> yes, fully sexual too.
>
>
>
> > However. On listniong to surfs up. It is erotic. A song
> > about about felling love and lust at the same time. So
> > much it makes you feel sick because your so in love with
> > someone. And thewy dont fell the same. Thats whta I
> > persieve the song to be anyway
> > > >
>


reply |

Previous: re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 02:11 am UTC 06/11/07
Next: re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 10:15 am UTC 06/12/07

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE