not logged in
| re: Bad For Good (the song) | |
Posted by:  |
Wilbury 07:22 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Bad For Good (the song) - rockfenris2005 07:11 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| Depending on Jim's viewpoint as to whether Safe Sex or It's All Coming back To Me Now could have been performed by Meat in the 80s, it could well have had significantly MORE new material on it than Back Into Hell ended up having. Think of all the "new" bits that Original Sin had! Original Sin | It Just Won't Quit | Good Girls |The Future --> that's as many "new" bits as back into hell had even before considering Safe Sex or IACBTMN. Not to mention the fact that we don't actually know when Anything For love began do we? He had the line as far back as Faster Than The Speed of Night, and who knows, when he used it there it may have been "borrowed" from another song he had already begun work on (think "Angels Arise" being a-sexually produced from 'Vespers'). > > > > That's a good point, I hope we DO hear a new Bad For Good > > by way of the Stage Spectacular. > > > > If Bat 2 had been released in the late 80s, I think it > > would have been a beautiful thing, *I* think... > > > I don't think it would have succeeded anywhere near what > BAT II actually did. Without "Anything For Love", and just > a bunch of recycles, I think it would have done as well as > "The Monster Is Loose". But you never know... > > WOULD Meat Loaf have had a hit with "It's All Coming Back > To Me Now"? I think THAT was the most inspired song Jim > wrote since the original BAT > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Bad For Good (the song) - rockfenris2005 07:11 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| Next: | re: Bad For Good (the song) - rockfenris2005 07:36 am UTC 06/16/07 |
| Thread: |
|