| re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" | |
|
Posted by: |
lotus_nz 12:15 am UTC 09/10/08 |
| In reply to: | re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - Pudding 11:40 pm UTC 09/09/08 |
| Puddings just fucking punch him in the face, he does not get it. He is in a world of his own the deluded idiot, SMEG BAT THE MUSICAL WITHOUT MEAT LOAF HAVING A BIT PART WILL FLOP, most of us are onboard with it , some may not even like it but it is fact, all they have to do is give each other a bit hug on the opening night and the show will be massive Imagine Jim their and no meat loaf, " so Jim what’s your role in this musical, and were is Meat loaf, Jim answers like Bevis and butthead been asked about girls. uuuuuuuuuurr > > The point is, Selling DOTV to Crawford's fans was the > > wrong audience. Selling the Neverland story to Meat's > > fans is the wrong audience. My logic holds... > > If you think Bat Out Of Hell: The Musical isn't going to > be associated with Meat Loaf by the general public then > you've been sniffing one too many envelopes. Jim can > either roll with it or try and fight it. If he fights it, > then he's wasting valuable time, money and energy on a > losing BATtle. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - Pudding 11:40 pm UTC 09/09/08 |
| Next: | re: "NO REASON Meat couldnt sing these too" - Pudding 01:01 am UTC 09/10/08 |
| Thread: |
|