| re: Meat writing Bat 1+2 claim evidence |
|
Posted by:
 |
AndrewG 07:51 am UTC 10/09/08 |
| In reply to: |
Meat writing Bat 1+2 claim evidence - Pudding 01:11 am UTC 10/09/08 |
|
Point 12 I can understand and basing on that Meat may have had a (slight if any) claim on the Bat trademark or at least using it for Bat 3 only if he wished imo.
However points 13 and 17 are mostly a load of shit.
> Following on from a conversation below and just to prove
> Smeg (the bastard) right...yet again(curse him) this is
> Meats writing claim for Bat1 and Bat 2.
>
> Click link below for full court papers and it's on page 10
> of 17.
>
> The Plaintiff being Meat Loaf and the Defendant being Jim
>
> 12. The concept of the Bat Out Of Hell album resulted from
> a joint creative effort between Plaintiff and Defendant
> Steinman.
>
> 13. Plaintiff was the artist, singer and Performer for Bat
> Out Of Hell. His role included providing portions of the
> lyrics, as well as developing the overall presentation of
> the songs. Plaintiff performed all the songs on the album,
> and was and is the sole user of the BAT OUT OF HELL mark.
>
> 17. Following the success of Bat Out Of Hell 1, a Bat Out
> Of Hell 2 album was released in September 1993. Defendant
> Steinman wrote the songs and produced the album. Plaintiff
> provided most of the lyrics, singing, performing and
> developing the overall presentation of the songs.
|
|
|
|
reply |
|
|
| Previous: |
re: Meat writing Bat 1+2 claim evidence - rockfenris2005 08:47 am UTC 10/09/08 |
| Next: |
re: Meat writing Bat 1+2 claim evidence - Pudding 08:01 am UTC 10/09/08 |
|
| Thread: |
|