not logged in
| re: RIP Michael Jackson | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 06:45 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
| In reply to: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - Smeghead 05:31 pm UTC 06/27/09 |
Who's to say that he wasn't being blackmailed . Just because they went public doesn't mean blackmail wasn't their intention, his reputation was falling apart and so he got rid of the problem. sounds like Blackmail to me. They probably went public with their bull shit so they would get paid off. Oh I was referring to pudding not you about the whole able so support their family thing. I was insinuating Pudding was your wife....lol > > > Funny how you didn't address my theory of him being > > blackmailed > > What's to address? It is an asinine theory. If you are > being blackmailed with something that isn't true then it > isn't done in public. For him to pay off someone who was > publicly accusing him is the same as admitting he did it. > He wasn't protecting his name. Your theory falls apart. > > > > I recall reading once that you dont provide > > for your family. What great role model for your children, > > Its a safe bet they'll grow up resening you and your wife > > smeghead. > > And where did you read that? I support my family (along > with my wife who works)... > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - Smeghead 05:31 pm UTC 06/27/09 |
| Next: | re: RIP Michael Jackson - Pudding 08:52 pm UTC 06/28/09 |
| Thread: |
|