not logged in
| re: Rory With Bonnie | |
Posted by:  |
pidunk 12:54 am UTC 06/11/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Rory With Bonnie - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 12:28 pm UTC 06/10/07 |
> > > > No one responds to somone who bullshitsa as much as you do. Ive sent an email to Jim asking to confirm or denie your claims in the next blog entry. You could ask, and he could decide to say anything. But bear in mind that logic is present in what I write, even as it may not be present in your reading. What have you read? What claims should Jim confirm or deny? And, confirming or denying, what would you believe? How much do you believe of important lies you are told by people who affect your life? Politics, leaders, bosses? Nobody ever lies to you? Nobody makes you rely on your own self-redemptive sense of perceptions and deductive reasoning? The litmus test between truth and lies, value and bullshit, is not in a confirmation or denial, but in the applications of true thought. Are you so unpracticed, that you are prepared to take anything on someone's say so, just so long as it makes your universe a tidy place to live in? We live in an age where lies are rampant. How do you develop your tests for who is telling a truth and who is not? The easiest has to be the truest? If that's the case, what is the value of a society based on choices by individuals? Individuals choose based on what is in their interests, but if they don't have the energy or the nerve to think for themselves, they do not get the knowledge they need to make those choices. Then we are all still the children we were, when we were children. I would say, growing up is one of those things that calls for someone to think for themselves, and not take the pablum that is given out. If you can't see what is in front of your own two eyes, reason with what is given for your intellect, then take what you want to take, of the fantasy anyone would give to you. There probably should at some point be a formal confirm or denial of what I say, but I don't think Jim would be prepared to give that outside of consistency of your own wishes, so if you want the lie, he'll give you the lie. If you want the truth, you have to see it, then the question for confirmation takes on new dimensions. Just imagine, if the Watergate burglers got away with it? If every person wanting to lie told as plausible a lie as they could, while the lie is the life, and the truth is the hidden? Imagine what world you really want. Imagine if you want the truth and are willing to see it, or if you want lies and want to be very free to live in fantasy again. No matter what you think of me, or what I write, you clearly forgot how to think. I am not to blame for that, nor worthy of criticism because you can't think for yourself. You never have had to apply your wits? Why not start seeing what it is like? Jim will give you lies, if you want lies. Ask him for lies, or ask him for the truth. If you want truth, he said to me, you get truth when you experience truth. You get lies when you are told lies. However. On listniong to surfs up. It is erotic. A song about about felling love and lust at the same time. So much it makes you feel sick because your so in love with someone. And thewy dont fell the same. Thats whta I persieve the song to be anyway > > > > > I have not attempted to learn that the moon landing was > > > faked, either. But it does not change the facts, you were > > > right in this case. > > > > > > Your lack of ability to see me in any kind of seriousness, > > is rude, because if you really meant that I was out of > > league from any form of logic, you would not resort to > > ludicrousy. You reserve the incredulous responses to those > > who would be credible who make you feel threatened. The > > point of fact that is missing is, what's your interest? > > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Rory With Bonnie - The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 12:28 pm UTC 06/10/07 |
| Next: | re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 02:11 am UTC 06/11/07 |
| Thread: |
|