HOME | MAIN BOARD | TWITTER | LOGIN | REGISTER | SEARCH | FLAT MODE

not logged in

re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again)

Posted by:
Scaramouche 04:56 pm UTC 08/17/08
In reply to: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - AndrewG 04:33 pm UTC 08/17/08

> My post was more about all the stuff I'd been reading over
> the last few weeks

I agree. Some of the threads & comments (in the last few weeks) are ridiculous, but as I said, that is just a result of having no Steinman news.

> I think it is fair to be point out though that some here
> definitely like to see Meat Loaf fail.

I think EVERYONE here wishes Meat was still at the top of his game vocally, but he 'aint.

The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for money.

Also I think the legal bollocks over Bat 3 left a sour taste in some people's minds.





reply |

Previous: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Markus 05:55 pm UTC 08/17/08
Next: re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 09:37 pm UTC 08/17/08

Thread:



HOME | MAIN BOARD | LOG OFF | START A NEW THREAD | EDIT PROFILE | SEARCH | FLAT MODE