re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Scaramouche 04:56 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
In reply to: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - AndrewG 04:33 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
> My post was more about all the stuff I'd been reading over > the last few weeks I agree. Some of the threads & comments (in the last few weeks) are ridiculous, but as I said, that is just a result of having no Steinman news. > I think it is fair to be point out though that some here > definitely like to see Meat Loaf fail. I think EVERYONE here wishes Meat was still at the top of his game vocally, but he 'aint. The fact that he continues to tour, with diminishing vocal returns, at more & more shows, means he's 'taking the piss' to a certain extent, and not giving value for money. Also I think the legal bollocks over Bat 3 left a sour taste in some people's minds. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Markus 05:55 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Next: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 09:37 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Thread: |
|