not logged in
| re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 06:05 pm UTC 05/15/11 |
| In reply to: | re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - rockfenris2005 05:32 pm UTC 05/15/11 |
Don't get me wrong, Bat 2 is great, its the album that houses my all time favourite song, which is Life Is A Lemon, but it may as well have been called "Jim Steinman's greatest hits" for all of the recycled songs that we're on their. I dont see why some of the covers could not have been replaced with songs like Who Needs the Young or Golden Egg. Songs like Good Girls or Frying Pan, while good, dont really add enough to the album. Bat 2 should have been entirely new songs, or at least most of them should have been > > > You want padding, go listen to Bat 2. > > Ughhhh!!!! That's like my favourite album, ever! But I get > it. Opinions and all that. But I love Bat 2, more than BFG > and OS, which I think are great, but it really comes > together on Bat 2, for me. FOR ME! > > Now I'm going to bed. > > Filled with recycled > > songs, that are usually worse then there original, and > > even a freaking recycled monologue. At least everything on > > Orginal Sin,that was written by Jim, was new, or at least > > never before released commercially (With the exception of > > the Storm extract) > > > > > > Yup. But I'm still not sure about the filler on WTTN. I > > > > know it's a concept album, but "45 seconds of > > > > ecstasy"...really... > > > > > > It's no worse than all the shit Jim used to pad out > > > Original Sin. | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - steven_stuart 01:11 am UTC 05/16/11 |
| Next: | re: Paul Crook producing Hell In A Handbasket - steven_stuart 01:13 am UTC 05/16/11 |
| Thread: |
|