re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) | |
Posted by: ![]() |
Scaramouche 04:28 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
In reply to: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - AndrewG 03:47 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Well this particular thread is 'fair comment', and just about relevant for this board. Someone here saw Meat live the other night and thought it was very poor, which like it or not, is just an honest critique. The 'sueing Meat for messing with the melodies' is obviously 'tongue-in-cheek'? I would much rather talk about the Bat musical and Jim's songs, but there is no info and therefore nowt to talk about. As a result, this board will always suffer, from time to time, with boring 'childish' threads. > I see it is Meat Loaf bashing time here once again. > Between that and Dorkington you guys don't seem to have a > lot to talk about? > > Do you honestly think that instead of putting effort into > making new music Steinman should waste time sueing Meat > Loaf over such an issue? Do you really think that is > effort and time well spent? > > If fans in what you guys probably think are following Meat > Loaf in "a delusional state", why not lot let them? Why > does it hurt you personally? Just don't go to the shows, > don't follow him and instead do something positive in your > life or is that impossible? > > I am sad to see the Rockman board has turned into this > rather childish playground. It used to be the first place > I went to for information and a discussion, now it's the > last, sorry. | |
reply | | |
Previous: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Smeghead 12:10 am UTC 08/18/08 |
Next: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - AndrewG 04:33 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
Thread: |
|