not logged in
| re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) | |
Posted by:  |
AndrewG 03:47 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
| In reply to: | Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 07:41 am UTC 08/17/08 |
| I see it is Meat Loaf bashing time here once again. Between that and Dorkington you guys don't seem to have a lot to talk about? Do you honestly think that instead of putting effort into making new music Steinman should waste time sueing Meat Loaf over such an issue? Do you really think that is effort and time well spent? If fans in what you guys probably think are following Meat Loaf in "a delusional state", why not lot let them? Why does it hurt you personally? Just don't go to the shows, don't follow him and instead do something positive in your life or is that impossible? I am sad to see the Rockman board has turned into this rather childish playground. It used to be the first place I went to for information and a discussion, now it's the last, sorry. > I'm not that much into the legal of songwriting, but isn't > it true that you can perform a persons song without > permission if they're published, but if you alter them you > should ask permission ? What I heard last night was NOT > Jim's songs and he should get an injunction that prohibits > Meat from performing them in public ever again. Even if he > doensn't win it would make great headlines and everyone > who attened this last tour will nod their head and think > "way to go,Jim". | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Macahan 07:41 am UTC 08/17/08 |
| Next: | re: Jim should sue Meat Loaf (again) - Pudding 09:29 pm UTC 08/17/08 |
| Thread: |
|