| re: An albums worth of Steinsongs on TMiL… | |
|
Posted by: |
Conas 06:21 pm UTC 04/24/11 |
| In reply to: | An albums worth of Steinsongs on TMiL… - Wilbury 11:31 am UTC 04/24/11 |
| In my opinion seven songs would not have been enough for Bat 3. Two of the songs (IACBTMN and BFG) had been around a good while too. So they really needed to add more. To be fair they had to get songs from somewhere, and they weren't going to get anymore from Jim. Had Jim been the sole producer and writer you'd have about 11 songs on the album I'd say, but I also believe 4 of the 11 would have been brand new Steinman tracks too, in place of Desmonds songs. Obviously Diane Warren, Nikki Sixx or the other writers wouldn't have been invloved. > So, with the few recent threads mooting the course 'Bat3' > took, it's got me thinking. > > There are 7 Steinman Tunes on TMiL. And almost all of them > ought to be significantly longer / more fleshed out than > they appear there. That is enough for an album surely — > over half of which would be 'new' (assuming Break It and > Seize the Night can be considered new… which they probably > would be). > > So… entirely unfounded speculation, but is it POSSIBLE > that the notion of not every song being written by Jim was > introduced to the project with Desmond (who also happens > to be a songwriter), instead of there being a pre-existing > need for more songs that Desmond satisfied?? > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: An albums worth of Steinsongs on TMiL… - LordRahl 09:12 pm UTC 05/05/11 |
| Next: | re: An albums worth of Steinsongs on TMiL… - Evil_One 07:12 pm UTC 04/24/11 |
| Thread: |
|