not logged in
| re: Rory With Bonnie | |
Posted by:  |
The_wolf_with_the_red_roses 03:37 pm UTC 06/04/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 11:49 am UTC 06/04/07 |
| Right listen to ME now you insane witch. Your begining to piss me of. Right off. RHPS is a random musical in which the the woman in it has laods of sex> it has no real plot. Everyone whos seen it says so. Its like family guy. You only spout the bull shit because Meatloaf was in it. You make the link cause of that sole reason. You are a liar. ANd until I have ant confirmation to the cpntery. I will continue to beleave so. Dose JIm still talk to you Susan. In your mind. My god yoiu annoy me. RH and Nl are NOTHING alike > > > > > > Look. RHPS is just TOO random to be written by Jim. The > > lyrics dont sound like Jims. ITs not JIms work. > > > > > I love evidence of open minds. Why don't you provide some > of that? Random? What random? There is a cohesiveness to > it, there is nothing random, and I have tied it well > enough to Jim's other works to satisfy anyone looking for > Neverland. Bear in mind several things: That this project > was written as a continuation of Neverland, not a > repetition of it, with characters spun off from there, not > in the same form, but in succeeding generations. There are > parallels like Historian=Criminologist, and other things. > Jim did the leitmotifs later on, when he wanted to begin > making a point about things being unmistakenly his. He did > not have such concerns before the RH debacle. So, I don't > know where it is that you call it random. I asked you to > try to be specific, so why don't you try that? Or are you > allergic to actual discussion? > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 11:49 am UTC 06/04/07 |
| Next: | re: Rory With Bonnie - pidunk 03:29 am UTC 06/05/07 |
| Thread: |
|