| re: Disgracefully Yours | |
|
Posted by: |
Leesa (gallytrotter@mchsi.com) 01:02 pm UTC 07/21/07 |
| In reply to: | re: Disgracefully Yours - pidunk 10:08 am UTC 07/21/07 |
| This reply of Susan's sounds EXACTLY like my father-in-law's line of reasoning when he was suffering from frontal temporal dementia. Confronted with 'beyond a reasonable doubt' evidence and argument and nope, still he twisted shit around--exactly like this. Never mind the facts, only Susan's little beliefs that this Thaya is potentially everyone and at present I MUST be it--why? Because apparently I have some things in common with her!! Next trip to the hospital, I sincerely hope an MRI is included. To think the woman is out on the street like this is very disturbing. Leesa > > > > Susan, you pathetic stupid bitch--I AM NOT THAYA! Your > > post is total nonsense. What the hell is a ganook? An egg > > in the womb? You are nuts. > > And of course Mutt Lange is a trend-setter--and yes, with > > Shania Twain's fusion of country to pop, damned right. > > Oh Puleeze. Or maybe Aaaaan Puleeze. Whatever. Twain's > fusion is lucky its not her hips to the opry > traditionalists. Pretty face, but not my idea of country. > Pop and country don't mix because one is pop and one is > country. Now, I know where some great pop performers have > made some interesting forays pleasantly into a country > atmosphere, but to put pop together with country and call > it a fusion is ridiculous. The whole guitar twangy thing > in Nowhere Fast is a nice effect, and maybe it could cross > over to country, for example in the The Dream Engine > collection, but I would not call it a country fusion. The > whole idea of fusion this and fusion that is solely to > confuse. The kind of fusion that a so-called fusion is, is > confusion. Period. > > > > > You're as ignorant about that aspect of music as you are > > on the rest of it. > > Nope. Even if I don't know something now, it is easy to > learn. Lange was not on the primary focus in thought. But > a look at his accomplishments do not render him in my view > a trendsetter. He is a background guy, in every capacity. > You could only know if he is a trendsetter if you know him > and know what he is doing. Otherwise, he has been involved > in nothing particularly stellar in my opinion, even if he > did involve himself with Def Leppard at the time when Jim > was to be working with them. Hmmmm.....that didn't have > anything to do with that situation, did it? > > > > > So now that Leesa M in Arizona shot your accusations of > > her being multiple personalities down, > > Denials do not tantamount to "shooting down" of truth. > Deny and deny all you want. Those assertions are > preposterous. I wrote about the myspace page and explained > its content before that post ever made the board. I have > nothing else to say on that. It is a stupid volley of > stupid arguments by someone who did not create a logical > construction of their deception. Is there such a thing as > a logical construction of deception? Thankfully not, no > matter how logical the deceivers want to be. It takes only > good logic to see through deceptions. > > > > >you're back to > > calling me Thaya--so I'm a baroness and Sandra Cabot as > > well I suppose and you called me in December of 1980 and > > all that bullshit--and you believe this?? So what is > > 'Thaya' doing in Iowa? Posing as a resident for 23 yrs in > > the same place? > > I first wondered what Thaya was doing in Idaho, where > Thaya admits to being, for about as long now. > > >What does your private eye say about > > that? > > Who are you referring to? > > > Bill, Hal, and Smith--don't have a clue. I've seen RH at > > the Englert Theatre in Iowa City 3 times in my life in the > > mid '70's--whatever. > > It fucking wasn't in Iowa in the mid-seventies. It didn't > open in the Waverly until 1976, and prints for > distribution weren't put around by the wankering awful fan > club until after 1981. > > You saw it three times you say, and you have all this > stock put into what someone says about it? > > > > All of your 'research' on virtually everything is bullshit > > and you simply can't face the fact that you wasted all > > that time. > > I wasted alot of time believing people who could not be > believed but looked believable. And by the way none of my > time with Jim was wasted. > > > >There is not one concrete shred of evidence to > > support anything. Just your mental illness. > > You are too much. I know many people who are quite willing > to swear on the bible that the grass in a park is not > green if they were given enough incentive to. So give it > up. I've got lots of evidence visible to you and everyone. > > > > > You wanna call me 'Thaya'? Whatever. I guess if Jim puts > > up with you calling him several different names on his own > > fansite, I'll tolerate your insanity and inability to > > understand who I am as well.... > > It's called admission. > > > > Leesa > > > > Of course no one ever wins an argument with you--you make > > no fucking sense to argue with! > > Nah, that's not what you used to say. :) > > > | |
| reply | | |
| Previous: | re: Disgracefully Yours - pidunk 10:08 am UTC 07/21/07 |
| Next: | re: Disgracefully Yours - Leesa 01:18 pm UTC 07/21/07 |
| Thread: |
|